All Case Studies
TestPre-DetectionR&D

Staged Off-Gas vs Thermal — Side-by-Side Bench Trial

By Engineering — Test · April 23, 2026 · 6 min read

Two detection layers, the same event catalogue, head-to-head over four weeks. The fusion of both beat either one alone — but the gap was not where we expected.

We knew the bench-rig answer in advance: off-gas catches Stage 2, thermal catches Stage 3, fusion catches both. What we did not know was the size of the gap on the events we actually care about — staged cell-level vents under near-deck-realistic conditions, not sealed-chamber idealised tests.

Event mix

  • Slow thermal injection (no electrolyte vent).
  • Nail penetration with vent.
  • Overcharge with vent.
  • External heat with no electrical fault.

Lead-time comparison (median, four-week run)

~9 min
Off-gas lead vs visible smoke (vent events)
~6 min
Thermal lead vs visible smoke (vent events)
~12 min
Fusion lead (max of the two, with confirmation)
0 min
Off-gas lead on non-vent events (it never trips)

The non-vent event was where the gap mattered most. Off-gas alone misses it entirely. Thermal alone catches it within its normal latency. Fusion gives the best of both without losing the non-vent class.

A vendor that benchmarks only on vent events flatters the gas layer. Real fleets see a mix; the fusion architecture has to be benchmarked the same way.
Related reading

Continue the thread